Menu
Banking Exchange Magazine Logo
Menu

The innovator’s view of Open Banking

Food for thought from a Chris Skinner dinner

Opening up the customer files goes counter to a banker's traditional instincts. But Open Banking amounts to that. Chris Skinner recently brought this up before a group of business dinner guests. Opening up the customer files goes counter to a banker's traditional instincts. But Open Banking amounts to that. Chris Skinner recently brought this up before a group of business dinner guests.

I hosted a dinner focused upon Open Banking recently and what it means to fintech firms and start-ups. There were no bankers at the table, but a lot of firms who consult, provide systems, or are deploying new businesses in fintech sat at the table.

The general consensus around the table is that Open Banking is all about customer focus, first and foremost.

Beginnings of a better experience

For example, the customer onboarding experience is horrendous today, involving forcing the customer into the branch with all of their identification documents.

If we could simplify and take the pain out of that process through APIs, that would be amazing.

The question then comes down to: How do you commercialize this?

After all, if onboarding could be done like check capture via a smartphone camera, capturing your face, passport, and address, then that becomes a commoditized service that no one wants to pay for, but everyone would use.

Challenge for challengers

Equally, how do you get customers to switch from banks to fintech firms, when they’re happy with the service they’ve got?

The biggest switch movement in the U.K. came around from Santander, but it was costing them a billion pounds a year with the 123 account that paid higher interest rates than any other U.K. bank account.

Want more banking news and analysis?

Get banking news, insights and solutions delivered to your inbox each week.

It did get people to switch but at a very high cost—which is why they’ve dropped it.

People rarely switch bank accounts, and this is the real challenge for the challenger banks. These challengers claim that it starts with gaining their trust through usage. So, you start as a secondary account and then the challenger can use the Open Banking API economy to give information enrichment.

That’s what Monzo, one of the leading U.K. digital banks, does. Over time, you find you’re always using the challenger’s app and so why are you still with the old bank? It’s at that point you switch.

That is the idea anyway, but it begs the question: How many challengers will really challenge the big banks versus be acquired by them?

This is what has happened with Simple and Atom, which are now owned significantly by BBVA, and many start-ups want the same end game: to be acquired by a big player at a high cost.

Open Banking no comfortable ride

Bringing that back to Open Banking, there is a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) about it.

This was evidenced by the way the mainstream U.K. consumer press all said you’d be hacked and defrauded if you allow third-party access to your bank account, even though the regulator has forced it to happen.

It’s obviously not true—why would a regulator bring in a regulation to make you less secure?—but the FUD works.

For example, if a third-party compromises your data, who is liable? Where is the burden of proof?

Generally, it is with the bank. Equally, GDPR—the General Data Protection Regulation—makes this a tricky one. How can you share all the customer data when the other regulation is telling you not to?

This has all been driven by E.U. regulations for Open APIs around payments. The U.K. has gold-plated the regulations, and made it into Open Banking, and the bottom line is that banks are being told to open up their data and processes to third parties.

But let’s go back to basics: Does anyone want this?

Scanning today’s reality

We are hearing a lot about banks talking partnership and co-creation, but we haven’t seen much of that happening so far. There may be a lot more in the future, but true partnering between fintechs and banks is few and far between today.

In fact, it appears that most banks are a bit confused about what’s going on. Half of the major banks weren’t ready for Open Banking in time, and many are asking where’s the business case for doing Open Banking, especially if it demands high risk and costly investments in systems upgrades and replacements.

What banks need to ask themselves is what does it mean if we open ourselves up to data sharing through APIs, and what does it mean if our competitors do this?

There is a win:win here and, for some bankers, Open Banking presents a huge opportunity to challenge their traditional competitors and their new ones. It’s all about carpe diem, seize the day.

Back at the table …

In summary, most of the attendees at my dinner felt there are a lot of things changing around the banks, but little changing in the banks themselves.

They believe Open Banking and Open APIs will change banks, but it will be nibbling around the edges of the system and that, by 2025, the big banks will be leaner, faster and cooler—but they will still be the big banks.

This blog is taken with permission from The Finanser, Chris Skinner’s blog, where it appeared under the title, "The innovator’s view of Open Banking"

Chris Skinner

Chris Skinner has become known as an international independent commentator on fintech through his blog, the Finanser.com. He is the author of the bestselling book Digital Bank and its sequel ValueWeb. Both books have been reviewed on www.BankingExchange.com and a chapter excerpt of ValueWeb also appears on the site. Skinner chairs the European networking forum: the Financial Services Club. He has been voted one of the most influential people in banking by The Financial Brand and has received similar honors from The Wall Street Journal and other organizations. Visit Skinner's professional website.

back to top

Sections

About Us

Connect With Us

Resources