Last year, in 46% of the FDIC IT examinations in which bank ratings were downgraded, inadequate vendor management was cited as a causal factor, says Donald Saxinger, senior examination specialist in FDIC's Technology Supervision Branch.
"I'm not saying it was the primal causal factor, but, in 46% of the downgrades, vendor management was cited," Saxinger says. He spoke during the recent ABA Telephone Briefing "Vendor management: Unlocking the value beyond regulatory compliance."
Saxinger says he drilled down with his colleagues to find more specific reasons this factor has emerged in troubling IT exam results.
"The No. 1 issue that a lot of examiners told me was the banks are not requesting copies of the exams of their service providers," he says. "We do examine service providers. It would be a very good monitoring and continued due diligence practice to see what the regulators are saying about your service providers."
Other related observations and suggestions gleaned from exam results include:
• Make sure to get the proper exam reports about individual vendors. Some banks just obtain reports for the host data center, but not for the specific application that the banks were using.
• Even the proper reports don't cover everything that a bank must consider in its security risk management efforts. For example, one service provider with an otherwise clean report did not have an internal audit program and its business continuity planning was poorly documented.
"When you're contracting with a vendor, you need to ask questions more than just what's in the [exam report]. What other types of audits do they have? You need a security audit. You need to comply with Gramm-Leach-Bliley. Do they have effective business continuity?" Saxinger says.
For information on obtain an audio copy and materials from the ABA telephone briefing, go to http://www.aba.com/Training/teleweb/Pages/tb103112.aspx.