Menu
Banking Exchange Magazine Logo
Menu

AML personal liability—what can you do?

“You used to call me paranoid—pressure—but even you cannot avoid—pressure”*

AML personal liability—what can you do?

One of the most dramatic events of 2014 in AML was the concern surrounding personal liability for compliance officers.

Why? Well, as I learned in law school, bad facts make bad law. Bad facts also make bad policy.

At least in the case brought by FinCEN and the Manhattan U.S. Attorney against the AML officer at MoneyGram, where the “facts” indicated that the officer had final authority to close accounts and discipline staff (or here, agents).

However, in what worlds do compliance officers really have that authority? Maybe Mars.

Implications of this trend

So what do we take from this?

First, the media has been harping on whether bankers are “too big to jail” without considering the distinction between actual criminal activity and compliance or risk mistakes.

Second, with the ever-changing regulatory expectations and the lack of real authority by compliance officers in many situations, are policy leaders concerned that talented AML officers will go elsewhere? They should be.

Finally, what about a corollary purge of power-crazed examiners that are allowed to second-guess risk-based AML programs and “win” only because they are the examiner?

I am tired of officials who say “show me”—when they know full well that exam overreach is a losing argument for the compliance officer.

How about in addition to “Tone at the Top” for financial institutions, we create a “culture of rationale compliance” for the regulatory community?

You want to end “derisking” and enhance financial inclusion?

Leave your egos at the door.

A practical response to MoneyGram

So, as we tilt at windmills on the issues above, how do we learn from the December action against the AML officer?

As with any enforcement action, you must compare the deficiencies noted with the type of institution you represent. Let’s look at some key facets of this action:

Disciplinary policy. Here, MoneyGram is a money transmitter, so the parallels to traditional banks are not exactly the same. For one, the official was charged with not creating a “discipline policy” with MoneyGram’s agents. 

I’ve worked in this area for many years and yet I’m not sure what a bank Chief Compliance Officer would need to do to make the examiners happy. But one possibility is at least performance reviews that hold staff accountable for BSA mistakes.

High-risk situations. Another charge had to do with the failure to close a “high risk” outlet displaying evidence of fraud. For banks, perhaps that could be compared to closing some high risk accounts, but what about “derisking?” Maybe not a comparison that is useful.

Failure to file timely SARs. This is certainly a theme in many enforcement actions and frequent regulatory criticism. The problem with the theme (not the facts alleged in MoneyGram) is confusion on what constitutes “timely.”

In my humble opinion, SAR timing issues are not clear by any stretch of the imagination. This is where regulatory form over substance negatively impacts the reason for suspicious activity reports.

Note: I have to mention this—I spoke to an AML official recently who said his examiner spent three hours on one transaction where the bank documented why they had not filed a SAR. At the end of the silly marathon, the bank agreed to file. Tell me what purpose that served? The bank will default to filing on any close case. Is that the goal of the SAR regulations? I’ll answer for you: No!

Effective audits and adequate due diligence. No argument from the AML community on this one. Whether auditing MSB agents or simply performing an audit of the institution’s AML program, these processes need to be sharp, updated, and changed when gaps are discovered.

Going forward: How can this situation improve AML?

Sadly, there remains extreme fear by the AML community on the targets now on their backs.

The comment by Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara: “Compliance officers perform an essential function in our society, serving as the first line of defense in the fight against fraud and money laundering” should be framed in every bank board room with accompanying internal authority.

But if just lip service is paid to this situation, then all bets are off and the pressure will continue…

Read Nancy Derr-Castiglione’s blog on the MoneyGram case: “MoneyGram/Haider case: Compliance penalties get personal

Read John Byrne’s “BSA/AML Ins and Outs for 2015”

* “Pressure”, from  Billy Joel’s “The Nylon Curtain,” 1982

John Byrne

John Byrne is Senior Advisor to the Advisory Board  of the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists and Vice-Chairman of AML RightSource. ACAMS, with more than 70,000 members, develops anti-money laundering/sanctions/financial crime detection programs and certifies specialists in financial and non-financial businesses and government agencies. Byrne is a nationally known regulatory and legislative attorney with over 30 years of experience in a vast array of financial services issues, with particular expertise in all aspects of regulatory oversight, policy and management, anti-money laundering (AML), privacy, and consumer compliance. He has written hundreds of articles on AML; represented the banking industry in this area before Congress, state legislatures, and international bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF); and appeared on CNN, Good Morning America, the Today Show, and many other media outlets. Byrne has received a number of awards, including the Director's Medal for Exceptional Service from the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the ABA's Distinguished Service Award for his career work in the compliance field. His podcast, "AML Now" (on ITunes) received a 2017 Communicator Award for hosting from the Academy of Interactive and Visual Arts. Byrne's blog on AML and Fraud on BankingExchange.com received a Gold Hermes Award in 2016. John received the ACAMS Lifetime Service Award in September. Byrne can be e-mailed at [email protected]; and don't miss John's updates on Twitter! You can find him at @jbacams2011

back to top

Sections

About Us

Connect With Us

Resources

Adaptive Authentication:

Superior User Experience and Growth through Intelligent Security

Banks and financial institutions find themselves trying to satisfy competing priorities. Fraud continues to grow at an alarming pace and in sophistication year-over-year.

Intelligent adaptive authentication is a new approach to combating fraud that solves this problem and achieves the twin goals of reducing fraud and delighting the customer.

DOWNLOAD THE GUIDE

OneSpan logo