A good example of big bank thinking I have referred to is Santander, and an incident that I fumed about the other day.
I usually make payments to E.U. companies via my business account, which pays no fees on E.U. payments as per PSD2 and SEPA (Single Euro Payments Area) principles.
However, I paid a Polish company £86 the other day from my personal account and only noticed, once the payment was confirmed, that Santander had charged me a £25 fee.
£25 on an £86 payment is a 30% surcharge. Unbelievable.
I fumed about it, as SEPA demands that E.U. payments are treated the same as domestic payments but, when I looked up the relevant consumer rights, it currently only applies to E.U. payments in Euros and not between British pounds sterling and Polish Zloty.
Anyway, I shared my frustrations on Twitter and the nice Santander social media team decided to step in and help.
I was being the usual Mr. Angry and insisting that they remove the fee as it was illegal under E.U. law, which it would have been if I were sending GBP to EUR. They insisted the charge was justified, and pointed me to their terms and conditions, page 29.
Page 29 seems to say that any payments in the E.U. and E.E.A. are treated as international payments, and subject to fees and charges which are not clear, but inflated. SEPA payments I am told will be £10 and international payments £25, even though I’m thinking they’re all E.U. payments.
Twitter to email to phone
I continue to whinge, and the team ask me to email them.
I email them and they ask if they can call me.
I send them my telephone number and they call me.
“Hello”, says a cheery voice, “it’s Ian from the social media team but, before I can talk to you, can you tell me your name, ethnicity, mother’s maiden name, inside leg measurement, and blood type?”
I go through the security checks just because I want to hear what Ian has to say about a 30% surcharge fee on an E.U. payment.
“And finally, can you tell me a standing order or direct debit on your account please, and for how much you pay on that?”
This is tedious.
“Ok, now we can talk”, says Ian, and I think, yes, what are you going to say.
“Ok”, Ian says, “you made a payment to Poland which is an international payment”.
“No, it’s not,” I say. “It’s a payment to a European country and as we are still part of Europe should not be exposed to any additional charges.”
“I’m afraid that’s not the case”, says Ian. I fully expect him to tell me about Brexit.
“I can’t help you. Have a nice day”
“If you had made the payment via a SEPA transfer, we charge £10”, says Ian, “but you made an international payment and we have a flat fee for those of £25.”
“Well”, say I, “under E.U. law I think you’re wrong, and I’m going to report you to the Financial Ombudsman.”
“You go ahead and do that sir, and sorry I cannot help,” says Ian.
“You cannot help?” says I. “So why did you call me?”
“To explain the fee,” says Ian.
“Not to waive the fee,” says I.
“No, I’m not authorized to do that,” says Ian.
This typifies the anger that customers have with the big banks. Complete inflexibility, lack of customer focus, and wasting their time engaging in a conversation where the person who is trying to help can do feck all.
Rant over. Just saying why I’ve switched to Monzo.
This blog is taken with permission from The Finanser, Chris Skinner’s blog, where it appeared under the title, “Why big banks fail.”
- Online Bank Aspiration Launches Debit Card that Rewards Social Responsibility
- Beyond the Efficiency Ratio: Leveraging Automation to Improve Profitability and Experience
- The Real Reasons Bank Customers Move to Direct Banks
- What the shutdown of JPMorgan’s Finn can teach banks: Even though you build it, they might not come.
- Squaring the Square Model