Menu
Banking Exchange Magazine Logo
Menu

Crypto Fallout Continues as Banks Seek to Reassure Investors

NY-based Signature hits out at media coverage while Silvergate Bank cuts headcount to manage costs

  • |
  • Written by  Banking Exchange staff
 
 
Crypto Fallout Continues as Banks Seek to Reassure Investors

New York’s Signature Bank has hit out at recent media coverage of its links to cryptocurrencies in the wake of the collapse of FTX.

The bank was linked to the failed crypto broker in an article in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) this week, which highlighted a $10 billion loan that Signature secured from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York to maintain its liquidity position as it began reducing the amount of depositary business it did with crypto-asset customers.

Signature had borrowed $11.3 billion from the Federal Home Loan Bank as of December 31, 2022, it reported, up from $2.6 billion a year earlier. This was “within its normal range”, the bank said in a statement, adding that it retained “sufficient liquidity” to continue operating as normal.

Signature reported a significant decline in its deposit base in the fourth quarter, with total deposits falling by more than $14 billion to $88.6 billion. Just over half of this amount related to digital asset banking deposits, according to the bank’s fourth quarter results.

Since the start of 2023, there has been a further $691 million reduction in digital asset banking deposits, the bank said, but overall deposits are up by $1.8 billion.

Signature issued a statement in November stating that it had a “deposit relationship” with FTX that accounted for less than 0.1% of total deposits.

President and CEO Joseph DePaolo said at the time: “Signature Bank is a well-diversified institution that employs appropriate risk management strategies that help us navigate the current challenging digital asset landscape. Our strong capital, solid earnings and overall diversification, continues to provide a source of strength for our depositor clients.”

Meanwhile, California-based Silvergate Bank — also mentioned in the WSJ article — has laid off approximately 200 staff as part of efforts to manage its cost base. Silvergate has positioned itself as a specialist banking partner for digital assets companies, meaning it was more affected by the turmoil in the sector in 2022.

In its fourth quarter results, the bank reported a fall in total deposits from $12 billion to $7.3 billion during the last three months of the year and a net loss of more than $1 billion, amid a “crisis of confidence” in the crypto sector.

Silvergate experienced “significant outflows of deposits during the quarter and took several actions to maintain cash liquidity”, it said in its results statement. These actions included obtaining loans, selling debt securities, and shrinking its workforce.

In November, CEO Alan Lane said in a statement explaining its exposure to BlockFi — another troubled digital asset business — that Silvergate’s platform “was purpose-built to manage stress and volatility”.

back to top

Sections

About Us

Connect With Us

Resources

Webinar: How Banks and Fintechs Are Building the New Payments Stack

Tuesday, June 30, 2026, 1:00 PM ET

As digital assets move into the mainstream, banks, fintechs, and payment providers are focused on a new challenge: how to build and scale products that deliver real business value.

In this session, Cross River and Fireblocks will explore how leading organizations are bringing digital asset products to market, the infrastructure decisions that shape growth and speed-to-market, and the lessons learned from teams building at scale today. From wallet architecture and custody models to vendor strategy and regulatory considerations, we'll discuss the foundational choices that can accelerate innovation — or create friction down the road.

Whether you're evaluating a new offering or scaling an existing program, you'll leave with a practical framework for understanding how digital asset infrastructure impacts business outcomes.

REGISTER NOW!