Banking Exchange Magazine Logo

How the Pandemic Could Damage European Banks compared with US Banks

EU and UK banks could be in a far worse position than their US peers following the COVID-19 pandemic, research has shown

  • |
  • Written by  Banking Exchange staff
  • |
  • Comments:   DISQUS_COMMENTS
How the Pandemic Could Damage European Banks compared with US Banks

A second period of lockdown could cause credit losses for European banks to hit €800 billion ($925.6 billion) over the next three years, according to research by consultancy group Oliver Wyman.

The continent’s banks are already facing €400 billion in losses due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the research showed, and a severe spike in cases could double this amount if it means governments are force to restrict movement again.

Despite the severe impact so far, this was still only 40% of the losses seen by Europe’s banking sector during the global financial crisis, the report found.

Oliver Wyman’s research also forecast that 5% of banks in the European Union and the UK were likely to be “troubled” by 2022, classified as “capital below minimum levels and profitability too weak to rebuild”.

More than half of capital in the continent’s banking system was expected to be run by banks “in limbo” – with sufficient capital to meet regulatory requirements but vulnerable to future shocks.

“The pandemic is unlikely to cripple the European banking sector,” said Christian Edelmann, co-head of EMEA financial services at Oliver Wyman. “However, many banks will be pushed into a ‘limbo state’ with very weak returns.

“Ambitious restructuring efforts will be needed, but to succeed they will need engagement and support from policymakers and regulators. That includes agreeing transformation plans with short-term capital impacts, encouraging consolidation to happen more quickly and accelerating single banking market efforts. The alternative is a system that struggles to support economic growth and falls behind the rest of the world.”

The research contrasts with recent stress tests of US banks, which showed the sector to have entered the pandemic in robust shape and capable of withstanding expected credit losses.

US banks were far stronger going into the coronavirus crisis than they were before the global financial crisis, according to analyses from the Federal Reserve and rating agencies.

Even under the harshest of the Fed’s Dodd-Frank Act stress tests, no banks were expected to face solvency issues.

The UK was particularly badly hit by the pandemic, Oliver Wyman’s UK and Ireland head David Gillespie said. Despite government support softening the blow to bank balance sheets, institutions would likely still have to cut costs and carefully manage credit losses.

“The small group of large UK banks entered the crisis in a relatively strong position, with average core capital ratios of over 15% and returns on equity of over 7%, both above European averages,” Gillespie said. “The vulnerability comes from overleveraged consumers and corporates that have been wounded by the UK having one of the biggest economic hits so far.”

back to top


About Us

Connect With Us


Webinar: Real-Time Payments in the U.S. Market

Time/Date: June 16, 2021 2:00 p.m. ET

The U.S. has come a long way in its journey to real-time payments, with TCH and Zelle in market and FedNow just around the corner. COVID-19 has accelerated that demand to move to real-time. Yet many financial institutions remain unconvinced of the need to move, with less than 3% of financial institutions signed up today.

In this Banking Exchange hosted webinar Celent’s Gareth Lodge, Senior Analyst, Global Payments, and Alacriti’s Mark Ranta, Payments Practice Lead, discuss the findings in the Celent research report, Real-Time Payments in the US Market: Speeding Up or Slowing Down? A Call to Arms.


This webinar is brought to you by:
Alacriti logo