Remittance providers collected $1.55 billion from outbound U.S. transfers in 2012, according to a study by Javelin Strategy and Research. Yet, providers failed to collect $573 million in revenue because consumers elected to send cash or checks through the mail, missing out on an opportunity to collect revenue on the transaction.
“Providers are leaving money on the table when consumers choose to use nonofficial means to send money internationally,” says Aleia Van Dyke, analyst of Payments at Javelin Strategy & Research. “Maintaining competitive pricing and reinforcing the convenience of digital channels are just a couple ways remittance providers can coax cash-friendly consumers to send their money through electronic means.”
Surprisingly, Javelin data confirmed that remittance transfers are not reserved solely for underbanked consumers—those that do not have a checking account—or immigrant workers. High-tech early adopters are more than twice as likely as all consumers to have made an international transfer., Mobile remittance transfers are quickly gaining popularity as well, especially with those consumers who already make mobile purchases.
Over half of consumers who have made a mobile contactless purchase are likely to make a mobile remittance transfer, Javelin says.
- How a Global Pandemic Will Affect Non-Cash Payments
- How COVID-19 and Tokenization Can Transform the Financial Sector
- 5 Examples of Cutting-edge Tools to Reinvent Your Mortgage Tech Stack
- More than regulation — how PSD2 will be a key driving force for an Open Banking future
- Bank of America Adopting Digital Financial Planning Tool Usually Developed by Fintechs